I continue to post "massive fail" results on FSL. 0 for 13 last night. Losers on 10 of my last 11 nights.
Fortunately, I don't have anytime to play for the rest of this week. This means I'll close out the month a slight winner.
The most interesting nugget from last night's games came from Kasieroll13. He handcuffed his starting pitchers in our contests. It's the first time I've ever seen him do this.
The concept of the handcuff is simple: Pick both starting pitchers from the same game. In theory, one pitcher will prevail - and there is a slight chance both pitchers will put up decent numbers.
However, in baseball it is also possible for both starting pitchers to miss out on the win.
I have seen this strategy used in hockey quite a bit. When two premier goalies face off, it's a solid play, because one of the goalies is guaranteed the win (barring injury).
In snapdraft hockey, where you pick two goalies, I have seen players handcuff quite a bit. (But there is a shutout bonus included there.)
In snapdraft baseball, you pick 2 pitchers. Handcuffing your pitchers is a poor play, because you need a huge score to win.
Back to FSL - by the numbers, it seems that the only way handcuffing really works is when there are enough multis to cover the cost of splitting the buy-ins. I'm really surprised that players like Kaiseroll13 and PrimeTime420 are hedging so much lately.
IMO, all that hedging is reducing the amount you can win. But maybe the strategy is changing as the offerings change.
I still believe that handcuffing on FSL baseball is a poor choice. Thoughts?